Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: goldworldnet who wrote (493563)	6/30/2012 6:36:47 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 793957

Right, so there was 5 against the Commerce Clause, but you said it's not a precedent against it because Roberts upheld the ACA and the others didn't. It just seems that 5 for limiting the Commerce Clause should count for something? The explanation Mark Levin gave is the 5 could have written their reasoning down as the opinion of the court, but did not do so, probably because of Robert's late switch. However, it serves notice of their opinion, and somebody will doubtless figure out how to bring a case that can get a formal ruling.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next