SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Android OS - GOOG
GOOG 284.90-0.2%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: sylvester807/7/2012 10:03:12 AM
   of 6432
 
Samsung S3 fire? NO, the user just stuck it in a microwave (most likely an iCRAP user... only they are that dumb)
Samsung: Galaxy 'S3' burns not caused by smartphone
zdnet.com
Summary: Investigators find that the only way to replicate the burns on a Galaxy S III that reportedly burst into fire is to put it in a microwave


By Karen Friar | July 7, 2012 -- Updated 11:23 GMT (04:23 PDT)

Samsung has doused worries that its flagship Galaxy SIII could spontaneously burst into flames, after investigators found they could only reproduce the burns on a damaged phone by putting it in a microwave.

An Irish user 'dillo2k10' posted on a messageboard in June that they had been using the Galaxy S III in a car mount "when suddenly a white flame, sparks and a bang came out of the phone".



On Saturday, the Korean hardware maker said an independent assessment by Fire Investigations UK (FIUK) found that "the energy source responsible for generating the heat has been determined as external to the device".

The tests looked not only at the damaged smartphone but also other Galaxy S III handsets, Samsung said in a blog post. The Android-powered device has energy-hungry components — a 4.8-inch screen and a 1.4GHz quad-core processor — requiring a hefty 2,100mAh battery.

However, the investigators found "the device was not responsible for the cause of the fire."

"The only way it was possible to produce damage similar to the damage recorded within the owner's damaged device was to place the devices or component parts within a domestic microwave," FIUK said in its report, according to Samsung.

In a post to the same Irish messageboard on Friday, 'dillo2k10' retracted their original statement about the incident, saying there was "no fault with the phone" and suggesting someone else had caused the burns when trying to dry out the Galaxy S III.

"The damage to the phone was caused by another person, although they were attempting to recover the phone from water, this later caused the damage shown on the phone," 'dillo2k10' wrote. "This was not a deliberate act but a stupid mistake."

The user's initial complaint and thread on the messageboard, which showed photos of the damaged phone (above), is now no longer available.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext