SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 34.50+2.6%Nov 21 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tony Viola who wrote (41083)11/26/1997 7:34:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Tony - Re: " Do you think the Intel price cuts are overdone? I do, considering the competition"

No, for two reasons.

1. Intel needs to position the Pentium II as an affordable high performance CPU, so driving prices down on that chip is imperative. Intel needs to keep the momentum going on transitioning the market to Pentium II/Slot 1 and they can't very well due this with $600 CPU costs.

2. Aggressive price cuts on the Pentium MMX as well as the Pentium II means that AMD and Cyrix MUST sell their K6 and 6x86MX chips for less money as well. This is a preemptive strike against these companies. By crippling them in their ability to generate significant profits (if any at all), Intel is insuring that these companies have reduced resources to continue on the design/development treadmill.

By allowing these companies to hang around and develop competitive technologies - and they have the same access (nearly) to the same resorces as Intel - Intel will lose whatever advantages it has. And access to profits is what Intel can deny to these companies by heavy duty price cutting. Denying them profits will, over time, reduce their ability to compete by virtue of limited R & D investment and capital (facility) expansion.

Paul
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext