SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives
SPY 691.97-0.3%Jan 30 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sandeep who wrote (35113)7/17/2012 3:15:27 PM
From: Brian Sullivan  Read Replies (2) of 222741
 
sandeep, I think that what would make things fairest is to taxes both at the same rate but to allow for inflation as well.

So let’s say you purchase $1000 or Gold or some other Commodity that is intended to hold its value with respect to inflation.

You hold it for ten years, and the final price of what you are holding simple increases by whatever the inflation rate is.

So if over 10 years the annual inflation rate is 0% the final value is the same $1000.

If the annual inflation rate is 3% the final value is $1343.90

If the annual inflation is 10% the final value is $2593.70

If the annual inflation rate is 20% the final value is $6191.70

In all cases you didn't really profit at all what you had at the end would purchase the same item(s) that it would at the start.

With a capital gains tax rate of 28% the government would take $1453.70 of the $6191.70 (as there would be a gain of $5191.70 since inflation is not factored into capital gains) Thus the government would be taking 23.5%
of your property via capital gains taxes if we are running under 20% inflation.

If the inflation rate remains very low or zero then this is not a problem.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext