A US National Health Care System? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: i-node who wrote (24287)	7/21/2012 2:46:32 PM
From: skinowski	Read Replies (1) of 42652

>>>> >> Billing revenues do not cover the costs of running a Hospitalist program. I'm surprised, I guess.<<<< Charges for individual services may be overblown, but the vast majority of patients are Medicare, Medicaid, those insured by plans with "negotiated" rates, and self pay (aka no-pay). Some patients who are outside these groups are subject to those unduly high rates. Patients who are hospitalized are much sicker and require far more time and attention - but Medicare rates are just about the same as for office visits. When all is said and done, I'd think 95% of Hospitalist programs would not survive without additional financial infusions from the hospitals. Examine any dealings between physicians, groups, and hospitals, and you will (almost) always find arrangements designed to compensate for the misallocations of funds between Medicare parts A and B. And I say "almost" just to be careful; I've never seen any. Not that hospitals would be rolling in dough, but in relative terms part A is more generous.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next