A US National Health Care System? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (24354)	7/26/2012 8:13:21 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) of 42652

"Which is all the more reason to do only what is necessary and keep their paws out of the rest. " As mentioned, the Interstates, railroads, NASA, pure research, etc, etc, etc. None "necessary", all of huge benefit to our society and our prosperity. Here is one I just heard on NPR on the way into work (and back on topic). Scientists have long searched for a prescription to treat addiction. But companies were hesitant to develop one. Charles O'Keeffe is the former president and CEO of Reckitt Benckiser, the company that developed Suboxone. "There's not much money to be made in it," says O'Keeffe. "This is not a disease space that a lot of people want to treat." The US government stepped in and partnered with Reckitt to bring the drug to market in 2000. The whole article here: npr.org If you want to correct me, I suggest you write something that contradicts what I wrote. Suggest away. I'll post whatever I feel like at the moment. As will you.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next