Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (499497)	7/31/2012 5:41:12 PM
From: Bob	10 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 794301

What's next? I don't know. But bi-racial and divorcees are "stretching" it in my opinion..........I would argue against the cake shop in those instances. What's next on the definition of marriage? Where does the left take this next? Marry your dog or cat or bird? Why not? Marry your sister or brother? Why not? Marry your son or daughter? Why not. You don't think any one of those are possible? They are trivializing the Sacrament. Marriage to probably a great percentage of our population is a "sacred" act. It is a sacrament in the Christian faith, very, very important to us. If gays want a "civil" union, go at it, government can give that their approval all they want, and provide any and all benefits to those in that civil union. Government has no business in what is basically a "religious" ceremony.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next