SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Fundamental Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: E_K_S who wrote (2124)8/2/2012 8:52:10 PM
From: Sergio H  Read Replies (1) of 4721
 
I'm ok with dropping PM on the basis of its product.
I second your idea of dropping stocks that have less than five votes. That would leave 17 if PM remains a candidate and 16 otherwise based on the voting tallies so far. This may change. I think we need to wait for Ox to finish his write-up(s), give a little time for more voting and then whittle down the top 15-17 picks to 10.

Before we go further......Does anyone disagree with this so far?

I would like to incorporate all of your suggestions once we get down to the final candidates.

The elimination could be done several ways: (1) limit a certain number by sector, (2) eliminate by size and/or market Cap, (3) eliminate by risk/reward ie) expected total return if held three years and then annualize that number and rank the group, (4) sort the group by 5 year PE or many other approaches.

Or selectively choose one of the candidate stocks to eliminate by making an argument against. You could compare similar candidate companies like F & CMI choosing the one to keep and the one to eliminate and/or just a simply reason to eliminate a stock.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext