SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 102.84-4.6%Oct 31 9:30 AM EDT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: hdl8/16/2012 9:13:38 AM
   of 93625
 
not a complete disaster

Rambus Receives Federal Circuit Decision in Patent Reexamination BW 08-16-2012

Rambus Receives Federal Circuit Decision in Patent Reexamination


Last update: 8/16/2012 8:30:02 AM

SUNNYVALE, Calif., Aug 16, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Rambus Inc. (RMBS), one of the world's premier technology licensing companies, today announced that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) has issued its decision in Rambus's appeal of an ex parte reexamination of Rambus patent No. 6,034,918 (918).


Although the Federal Circuit has affirmed the United States Patent and Trademark Office's (PTO) rejection of claim 18, the decision does not affect the PTO's previous confirmation of the two other claims challenged in the reexamination. These two claims were asserted by Rambus and in a jury trial before Judge Whyte in the Northern District of California found to be infringed by SK Hynix. Claim 18 was not asserted in that patent trial.


"While we respectfully disagree with the Federal Circuit decision, we are pleased that the PTO previously confirmed the two other claims challenged in the reexamination. These two claims were amongst the ten that a jury in California found valid and infringed by SK Hynix," said Thomas Lavelle, senior vice president and general counsel at Rambus. "We are evaluating our options for the 918 decision and remain committed to protecting the technology developed by our talented team of engineers."


History of the case


In 2009, SK Hynix requested reexamination of claims 18, 24 and 33 of US patent number 6,034,918. The USPTO Board of Appeals and Interferences affirmed claims 24 and 33, but rejected claim 18. The only issue before the Federal Circuit in this case was Rambus' appeal of the rejection of claim 18. Previously, SK Hynix was found to have infringed claims 24 and 33 of the '918 patent by a jury in the Northern District of California.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext