Golden Triangle Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Triangle

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: klinker	8/20/2012 11:33:20 PM
	of 493

just comparing a map pretium put out in its last technical presentation for august with the seabridge deep test drill plan map... According to to the sea map one of the glaciers emanating from the high direction is about 2 kilometers shorter then the same glacier in the pretium presentation.. That glacier does not run to the brucejack but beside it and to then to a more westerly ice sheet.. The sulpherets glacier has retreated just under a kilometer more in the sea map then the pretium map... the sulpherets one being a wider ice flow one presumes it take a bit more time for the ice to melt.. I can see why a rock island emerged a bit further back in the sulpherets glacier. The island where the copper showing was discovered. Brucejack area is much higher then the the area near the sulpherets glaciers end but the ablation looks to be very agressive in this area of the golden triangle

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next