SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Network Associates (NET)
NET 173.44+0.1%Jan 23 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Terry Davis who wrote (1728)11/28/1997 10:34:00 PM
From: Chuzzlewit  Read Replies (6) of 6021
 
Terry, nobody is talking about 80% growth going forward. I think that 45 - 50% is attainable in the next year, with growth slackening to about 40% per annum thereafter. On what drives mergers, I again must disagree with you. Unfortunately, managements frequently have their own agendas which differ markedly from those of their shareholders. For example, management may view a merger as good for them, because it strengthens the company as a whole and leads to greater management bonuses by increasing corporate profits. Unfortunately, the deal may be bad for shareholders because it decreases the value of the stock because it leads to decreasing earnings per share.

What ought to drive mergers are synergies, and when a merger is properly structured the shares of both companies will increase in value. As an example of this kind of acquisition look at the merger between QFC and Fred Meyer. The key test is whether the merger enhances shareholder value. This is the only raison d'etre for a merger. If management cannot clearly demonstrate this to the satisfaction of shareholders they have no business running the company on behalf of the shareholders. Larson has so far failed this test.

Regards,

Paul
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext