>> That's debatable
Yes, it is.
Obama clearly had more raw knowledge of the world, but he sorely lacks administrative skills which Palin obviously has. And more importantly, he is naive and gullible.
For example, the comment he "passed" to Putin was exceptionally naive. I can't think of another president who would have made such an incompetent bungle, except perhaps Carter. And I certainly don't think Palin, were she president, would have done something so downright stupid.
While Palin talks funny and confuses words like Bush did, she, like Bush, lacks the arrogance Obama possesses and is not naive as Obama is. Just think of all the crap Obama did his first month or two in office that was ridiculous. Does anyone remember that his first couple weeks in office he actually planned to release more abu Ghraib photos? Or later on, that his AG refused to prosecute those thugs standing in front of a polling place threatening voters? That he was going to close GTMO or perhaps his most incompetent action of all, enacting and blowing a trillion-dollar "stimulus" when there is no evidence, whatsoever, this kind of waste has ever helped anything.
I don't think Palin, had she become president, would have made any of these foolish mistakes.
There is more to life than what you learn at university. |
