Lu:
1. This is sometimes obvious, usually not. MSFT, INTC have this quality, IMHO. ORCL had this quality 5 years ago (future beyond 1-2 years unknown as MSFT moves into databases). I'd recommend you read some books.
2. Growth projections I get from my broker, and by looking at history, and (where available) by looking at independent market analysis (e.g. Gartner Group, etc.) Some 5-year compound annual growth rates on my "fab five": MSFT: 20-25% (broker), 25-30% (me) INTC: 20% SUNW: 20% CSCO: 30-50% ORCL: 30-40%
3. Buying is easy. If your target is well-chosen, you won't go wrong long-term. I use a valuation system based on projecting the growth rate out 5 years (optionally 10 if you really like the stock) and discounting it back versus a market average. The following is *not* investment advice, but my personal opinion on some stocks I follow: MSFT: accumulate (fully priced at this level, buy fixed dollar amounts over many months to enter). INTC: accumulate (as per MSFT). SUNW: hold (price is fair, but franchise may be threatened beyond 2 years). CSCO: buy (price is fair, growth rate strong). ORCL: hold (fully priced). NSCP: sell (very overvalued). I watch valuations on my favourites (such as MSFT) primarly so that I can buy aggressively when they're cheap (bought MSFT big at $84 in January based on this).
For what it's worth, my personal valuation table based on current interest rate/inflation environment:
10% growth: 12.0 P/E (forever) 15% growth: 14.9 P/E (5yr), 18.7 P/E (10yr) 20% growth: 18.5 P/E (5yr), 28.6 P/E (10yr) 25% growth: 22.7 P/E (5yr), 43.0 P/E (10yr) 30% growth: 27.7 P/E (5yr) 35% growth: 33.4 P/E (5yr) 40% growth: 40.1 P/E (5yr) 45% growth: 47.8 P/E (5yr) 50% growth: 56.6 P/E (5yr)
Note that any growth rate greater than the market average can be made to justify an arbitrarily high P/E today, if you're willing to go out far enough. For instance, if you believe MSFT can sustain 25% growth for 9 years, (or 20% for 13 years) you can justify today's 38 P/E. For growth rates above 25%, I'm unwilling to look beyond 5 years. Above 50% growth, I make up a custom projection out 5-10 years that gradually soft-lands the growth rate to something sustainable, then discount it back based on a soft-landing of the P/E.
4. Usually, I don't sell unless a stock becomes incredibly overvalued. For instance, I'd be selling KO (Coca-Cola) at these prices (for a 40 P/E, I'd rather take the proceeds of selling KO and buy MSFT). But, if I'd owned HWP before it fell, I would not have sold even though it was overvalued at 25 P/E (vs 15% growth). "Incredibly overvalued" means the price is 50-100% over fair, meaning I can exit, pay my taxes, and still be ahead after reinvesting. This rarely happens (and never happens in the case of MSFT). Sometimes, I sell because I need to rebalance my portfolio. For example, CSCO's growth rate looks like it will slow to below 80-90%, so I need to find something else to occupy the "high-growth speculative" portion of my portfolio. Occasionally, I will sell if I feel that the "dominant market position" or some other intangible quality is in doubt. This is very, very difficult to know. Often, these doubts are wrong. For instance, I have vague unease about the following: 1) ORCL's dominance of databases as MSFT moves into this area 2) SUNW's dominance of servers as Wintel moves into this area 3) CSCO's high margins as competitors move into networking There is no evidence yet of any of these problems. Frankly, if you're already in a stock, it's usually better to wait until there is solid evidence, let the stock take a hit, and get out, rather than trying to anticipate the trend. (Try to anticipate, and you'll likely be either totally wrong, or years too early -- either way, you'll miss a lot of upside on the stock.) If I must anticipate, I try taking 1/4, 1/3, or 1/2 my profits "off the table", as I did with ORCL a few months ago. (Note, however, that these sorts of doubts are very relevant to making a *buying* decision.)
Good Luck! |