Imperial Metals (IPM.T) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Imperial Metals (IPM.T)

IPM 1.920

-2.0%

Nov 6 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: refugee investor who wrote (1151)	8/30/2012 10:52:40 AM
From: Italian Investor	of 1366

Yea I own GM, the reason I picked it over F was because I like there financials better. They both look cheap looking @ the P/E but when looking @ every other valuation measure GM is much cheaper. Also there are way more gurus in this name than F. Pabarai has almost 20% of his hedge fund in it, Eihorn 5.5% and Tepper 3% and there are many others. Looking @ F it is only Tepper that holds a 2.3% position. Lou S, noticed he has a very small position in OAK that is a name I have been trading here and there like Howard Marks, very well managed company.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next