International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: O. H. Rundell who wrote (28675)	11/29/1997 2:21:00 PM
From: kimberley	Read Replies (3) of 35569

O.H. Doesn't compute to me, either. i'm of the opinion (sorry to those who disagree) that the shareholders were intentially misled. <<Of course, according to Bateman the process they used was uneconomic and yielded low recovery.>> yep, they didn't even come out with an uneconomic *high recovery, which would have at least given some hope...as it stands now, even though we've heard plenty about high recoveries, never has it been verified. ipm has .04ish, and no recovery. anything else is speculation, imo. best, kim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next