SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (671581)9/5/2012 2:29:11 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) of 1582943
 
Ted,
I just answered your question. It doesn't. That's the secondary issue. The important issue is what the woman wants. Everything else falls from that.
I think you hit upon the key point that I was going to bring up in my response.

The truth is that we're letting the mother decide whether the unborn child is a life. If she wants to keep the child, she'll refer to it as "her baby." If she wants to kill it, she'll refer to it as a "fetus."

That decision, of course, is guided by a lot of factors. No one, not even the pro-choice crowd, wants to let that decision be taken lightly. Even Bill Clinton declared that abortion should be "safe, legal, and rare" (before doing everything in his power to make it safe and legal).

Rape, along with other tragic circumstances such as incest, of course makes the decision a heavy one. But remember that the mother gets to decide whether the unborn child is a "life" or a "fetus."

That is how rape factors into the question. It affects the very person whom we've given power to decide whether her unborn child is a "life."

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext