NOK... without the BS Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : NOK... without the BS

NOK 7.150

+3.5%

Nov 3 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Road Walker who wrote (443)	9/6/2012 5:22:33 PM
From: sense	Read Replies (1) of 580

" Or is there some invisible hand manipulating EVERY charting program..." Yes, there is... and that's the point. It isn't that MY chart providers are misrepresenting the data in the database, to me, so my charts are different than others ? It is that the background DATA were being re-cooked... after the fact... as the historical data were being "re-readjusted"... The ONLY way I see that could have been done... to get the result we see in the charts... where the 60MA suddenly dropped a couple points more than the 20MA did on the SAME TRADE... when the history doesn't support that happening ??? It means they re-re-hypothecated trades from 1 August... and that altered the charts... to misrepresent the real impact of the trade that DID occur... So, if you captured a hard copy of the trade data from 1 August that can't be similarly "revised" after the fact... as ALL digital dependent data CAN be revised... and you think you can make some "different" sense out of that mass of garbage in charting than others have... given that the captured data from that day is NECESSARILY wrong... as trades ARE being "rolled back" and "undone" and the data we have is thus CLEARLY IS being fictionalized after the fact... as the NITE trades are being "rolled back"... "untraded"... ??? The only RATIONAL explanation I CAN see for the change in chart performance ? The MATH is what points directly back at 1 August... and, when the math pointed at that... THEN I looked to see why 1 August was appearing at the end of the MATH pointer... It "appears" that the "masters of the universe" are using the magical ability afforded them by the NITE debacle... to re-invent past trading history in real time... as required to deliver the chart performance they wanted to see right now... Was that ability used... "just" to manipulate the chart in the recent trade ? Determining that there was some other rationale or some "coincidence" that occurred... that just "happened" to result in the precise impact that DID result in the charts... at that precise TIME ? LOL!!! That would require some "once in eternity" sort of coincidence... I'm not addressing the "who did what and how" issues... I'm simply pointing out that "there's a smoking gun sitting right there"... which there undeniably is. If you want to pretend it doesn't exist ? That conflicts with WHAT DID HAPPEN... HERE... We were chatting here about the 60MA at $2.43 and the trade that had just violated it... and, then, even though it had been at $2.43 all day... the 60MA suddenly MOVED... right then... to a different value... ??? A stock that just grossly violated "support"... suddenly "held support" ? The trade is a fraud... and that's a proof of it...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next