Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (26243)	11/29/1997 10:20:00 PM
From: Yousef	Read Replies (1) of 1572953

Jim, Re: "Obvious answer is a shrink to .25...which is likely why it's taken so long to get to 266. Which also suggests AMD isn't too good with .25 yet..." It also strongly suggests that AMD's .35um process is inferior as compared to Intel's .35um process. Why is that ?? Better device understanding ... better process engineers ... more effective spending of R&D dollars?? I believe that all three questions are answered ... YES!! Re: "What some forget is that Intel at .25 could maybe yield 300MHz Pentiums. Am I on track here?" You are not "on track" here ... Intel is producing 300Mhz PII's with their .35um process. Intel WILL be able to produce 300mhz CPU's for the Mobile market with their .25um process ... maybe this is what you are thinking!!?? Make It So, Yousef

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next