SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (26961)9/8/2012 4:40:35 PM
From: gamesmistress3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 85487
 
Ryan could never catch up to Biden in the lying department. Then again Biden seems to have doing it most of his life. He was accused of plagiarism in law school, he plagiarized a whole speech of the British politician of Neil Kinnock. He claimed he had a "blue-collar" background (he doesn't), he keeps claiming his wife was killed by a drunk driver (she wasn't, the other driver was not drunk, and wasn't even at fault). But what the hell, it's a great story, so what does it matter if Biden maligns some poor shmoe's reputation? Every time the guy opens his mouth he "misstates" or flat out lies about something. Like this:

sayanythingblog.com

or this:
Great Moments in Vice Presidential Lying

By Jonah Goldberg
September 2, 2012 11:27 A.M.

As the feeding frenzy over Paul Ryan’s lies-that-aren’t-lies continues, I thought a little flashback might be in order. It’s hardly a rebuttal to the calumnies against Ryan, but that’s already been covered by others (See Steve Hayes’s excellent new piece here). Admittedly, Joe Biden wasn’t vice president in 1988; he was merely running for president as a U.S. senator. This is from my cover story on Biden from a few months ago.

. . . Biden also seems driven in no small part by a staggering intellectual insecurity. The figurative evidence room is full of examples. The most notorious comes from Biden’s 1988 bid for the Democratic presidential nomination. He had been hounded about his law-school record and plagiarism problems (among other things, he copied five pages from a law journal for a 15-page paper and then claimed it was a footnoting error), and he was asked a question about his academic record by a resident of New Hampshire.

He responded: “I think I have a much higher IQ than you do, I suspect.” He went on:

I went to law school on a full academic scholarship, the only one in my class to have a full academic scholarship. In the first year in the law, I decided I didn’t want to be in law school and ended up in the bottom two-thirds of my class and then decided I wanted to stay, went back to law school, and, in fact, ended up in the top half of my class. I won the international moot-court competition. I was the outstanding student in the political-science department at the end of my year. I graduated with three degrees from undergraduate school and 165 credits — only needed 123 credits. And I would be delighted to sit down and compare my IQ to yours.

Most of these statements were outright lies. Biden graduated from college with just one degree, not three. Yes, he did win a moot-court competition, but he graduated 76th in his class of 85. He wasn’t the outstanding political-science student. And why is he still talking about how many credits he graduated with? Who does that?

Here’s the video, for those interested.

youtube.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext