International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: O. H. Rundell who wrote (28712)	11/30/1997 11:11:00 AM
From: go4it	Read Replies (1) of 35569

OH, Your post seems precise and accurate to me. I didn't consider the letter to Frank in my thinking and that was the part that I was missing and asking for. No, the events and that have occurred and the unanswered questions bother me to no end. I am furious with the way some things were handled. It is possible that the breakup in the marriage between Frienship and IPM has everything to do with the sample sizes that can be tested. Like you I expected the recovery numbers that we have been told about and didn't get but where do we go from here. The metals are there. We can now add silver to the list of metals. I believe that we are going to have high grade channels running through the property (just a belief not fact) like maxam and GPGI have. One thing is certain in my mind and that is things need to change and I think giving share holders accurate updates would be a good place to start. Thanks for your response. Chuck

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next