2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 379.91

+0.4%

Nov 11 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TobagoJack who wrote (94617)	9/15/2012 2:12:45 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (2) of 217688

Where you thinking of the possibility that the main limit for bearing children is economic? If so why not a woman that wants more children should have several husbands to support her, the children and pay for the needed "nanny" ? Only 100 short years ago it was a very common occurrence that a family had 4 to 7 children if not more in Europe or N. America. Today the cost of living and the cost of the "nanny" restrains the birth rate. The solution - multiple husbands to wait in line for spending an intimate night with the coveted wife and share the economic burden of raising the many children

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next