Gallery Resources (Alberta GYR) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gallery Resources (Alberta GYR)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Robert J. Mifsud who wrote (1108)	11/30/1997 2:20:00 PM
From: Terry J. Crebs	Read Replies (1) of 1829

Sure Robert, on 5-Nov-97, Gallery's PR (end of 6th paragraph) states: "...the Company has arranged to carry out a down hole pulse EM survey to commence early next week." LaMontagne does not DO pulse EM (i.e., like Crone or Geonics or SIROTEM time-domain electromagnetic systems) while LaMontagne's UTEM system (for University of Toronto ElectroMagnetics) uses a "saw-tooth" or "hybrid" transmitter waveform. Yup, a pretty big difference for one like me. I know no experienced mining geophysicist who calls UTEM a "pulse EM survey". If that's what Gallery did--then yes, my comments about Gallery's changing contractors was wrong, as I assumed OK-M1 had already been probed with a non-UTEM system in early November. The releases and my experience with differences between Borehole-PEM and -UTEM was the basis for those comments. Robert, I appreciate your questioning and pointing-out my assumptions. Yup, I get it wrong sometimes too. Good Luck & Have a nice weekend, T.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next