SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: CF Rebel9/16/2012 10:01:18 AM
8 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 793597
 
The text of the First Amendment to the Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Barack Obama is not "Congress," so perhaps that is why he feels he can spend four years promoting a specific religion, "islam," in his speeches and policies. Just as he has issued executive orders in order to subvert or skirt the law, he surely feels he can subvert the Constitution by promoting the islamic religion from his pulpit. His administration and departments have scrubbed all references of terrorism and jihad to islam and if that isn't proof of "respecting the establishment" of a specific religion, nothing is.

It would be interesting to find out how many times Obama has used the words "islam" and "muslim" in all of his speeches and addresses as president. And, in comparison, it would be interesting to know how many times he has used the words "christianity" and "christian," or "hinduism" and "hindu," or "buddhism" and "buddhist," or "judaism" and "jewish" in all of his speeches and addresses. It would surely be a lopsided affair that clearly promotes "islam" over all else. And liberals, those hypocritical "religiophobes," fear presidents who are christians.

As one who has put on the airs of a king, he should as well be titled as one, "Barack the Arrogant." And, when the darkest secrets of his life eventually see the light of day after his occupation, as they will, he will become "Barack the Usurper." This most dubious of presidents has never forgotten that he is a mere mortal, because he has never even considered that he is one. No man with such a lack of humility should find his way into the highest office of the U.S.

CF Rebel
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext