JMAR Technologies(JMAR) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : JMAR Technologies(JMAR)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Starlight who wrote (4252)	11/30/1997 8:39:00 PM
From: Arthur Radley	Read Replies (2) of 9695

Elizabeth, When you give a special interview to Investors Business Daily in order that the interview will be a special feature in their publication, that is as "public" as you can get, with the exception being the WSJ, Barron's, and CNBC. Considering the major funding of this project is taxpayers monies and it is not a national security project, why all of this secrecy. I'm sure that by using federal tax dollars, this would fall under the federal laws and the Open Records Act would apply. I have a fairly open mind about most things. Could someone give me just one reason why JMAR would want to keep this a secret? Also, could someone give me just one reason as to why any corporation would not want their name associated with them watching a demonstration of another companies product. To suggest otherwise, is to imply that JMAR is going to give ONE company an exculsive right to use this product. I would be more inclined to think that JMAR would want ALL companies to know that they have a unique product. I've always operated on the assumption that..."greater the demand for your product, the higher the price you can charge for it". Secrecy doesn't help promote demand in my opinion.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next