Shades,
Unfortunately, one of the downsides of being a publically traded company is that you cannot spend every waking moment in rumour control. But then again, if the company had a credible history of profitability and sound management, many of these questions would be muted by past performance. Furthermore, the company has a responsibility to properly inform and educate its shareholders. Among these would be to get a determination on current operational status in Nicaraugua and the DR. Let us know what you find out.
As for being cool headed, I don't believe that most of those who know me would concur. <VBG> I like to mix it up just like the next guy, but when it goes too far, as it did between myself and Pugs, it leaves a bad taste in my mouth and demeans both of us.
Shareholders of this company have a heavy burden as there is a lack of current and accurate information publically available on this company. Thus, it is incumbent upon the Yeas (since you all need more people to buy to force your squeeze), to gather accurate information and to force the company to respond as to what the company's current status is.
Make this company educate you. For a true short squeeze to develop, the yeas must resolve the unanswered issues to the satisfaction of the "neutral" or inquisitive observer.
And btw, from my sources, the SEC has mixed feelings on the internet, seeing far more bad than current good. I'm sure that they are perusing this thread with a similiar bias. That is why where ever exists "irrational exuberance" <vbg>, there must be nays that force you to once again into objectivity.
Regards,
Ron |
