International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: O. H. Rundell who wrote (28758)	12/1/1997 2:22:00 AM
From: go4it	Read Replies (2) of 35569

OH << If the story were true and if IPM had paid up, what would the stock be worth now?>> Now that isn't fair. If the story were true and the process turned out to not allow itself to commercial operation then what would have happened after that revelation. Instead of falling from $5 it would have fallen from what $50 ... $500 what I don't know but the debicle certainly would have been alot worse than it was. Personally I think it would have been nice to have had a third party sign something, even if it were AuRic, that stated something to the effect that results were 0.25+ au but that the process was non-commercial thus we cannot use these numbers. If for no other reason than credibility. The thing that I don't understand is we are seeing these exact same numbers or better from GPGI, Mxam and Naxof but you don't believe that IPM doesn't have it without 3rd party verification? I don't understand that.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next