SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jimmenknee who wrote (28765)10/9/2012 5:58:49 PM
From: arvitarRead Replies (1) of 53574
 
I would agree, except I would prefer to see your statement qualified: the truth is probably, or possibly, somewhere in the middle. But we'll never know unless one of the plaintiffs or defendants gives us all the facts and details, and they're probably prohibited from giving *any*.

I took the point of view of defining "win" as being whether Bordynuik and JBI got what they were after in court, which was a judgement against the defendants for defamation. I did this, in part, to counter the unchallenged claim that "JBI wins defamation suit!!!", and also because we can't know anything beyond what was shown in the leaked court document posted by "Rawnoc". If there were out-of-court settlements beyond what was in the leaked document (and we don't know if there were), they wouldn't necessarily be favorable for the plaintiffs. For example, it's not impossible that Bordynuik and JBI found themselves with a weak case and unsympathetic judge, with the defendants in a strong position to counter-sue.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News