SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: scion10/9/2012 6:45:00 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 19428
 
The Court in charge of the case is the United States District Court for the District of Arizona (the “Court”) and the case is known as Siracusano v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 04-0886-PHX-NVW.

The entity that leads the Litigation, NECAIBEW Pension Fund (the Decatur Plan) is called the Lead Plaintiff, and the parties it sued are called Defendants. Defendants in this case are Matrixx, Carl J. Johnson, William J. Hemelt, and Timothy L. Clarot.

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

If you purchased Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. (“Matrixx”) common stock or put or call options (collectively, “Matrixx Securities”) during the period between October 22, 2003 and February 6, 2004, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and are
not otherwise excluded from the Class, you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
[...]
More

ktmc.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext