SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jimmenknee who wrote (28771)10/10/2012 8:02:28 AM
From: arvitarRead Replies (1) of 53574
 
You are right, and I was wrong.

1 (a) is very broad, and seems to say (I hope I'm wrong) that the defendants can't communicate anything at all in any way, publicly or privately, that is directly or indirectly related to the plaintiffs. It seems to cover "any media or form of communication", which would include private phone conversations, private emails, and private face-to-face conversations.

I understand TBG's disbelief.

This seems to take away freedom of expression rights that I understood to be guaranteed by Canada's Charter. Especially since the order seems to be unrestricted with respect to all details about communications by the defendants,such as content, intention, and circumstances, just so long as it isn't even indirectly about the plaintiffs. I find it hard to believe a judge allowed this.

What I find particularly odd is that the public communications by the defendants about the plaintiffs have been relatively benign, to my knowledge. For example, Sandra Elsley's (Bordynuik's ex- common law wife) most recent posts that I could find amounted to two low-key posts in the year 2010 on IHUB. That's assuming she doesn't post under other aliases.

It makes me question the true intent of the suit. It didn't seem to be aimed at silencing "message board bashers", as had been broadcasted by Bordynuik's mouthpieces around the internet for the past two years.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News