Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: PaperProphet	10/15/2012 12:08:15 AM
	Read Replies (3) of 53574

Posted the following message on another board and was immediately deleted: So this is the likely "improper release" of "confidential" information referenced in the press release, replete with assumptions which, according the the PR, are not to be relied upon because the assumptions "may" already be different now from six months ago or "may" be different in the future--even though the processor and fabled catalyst have been supposedly constantly tested since mid 2009. Somehow there are still no conclusive results which can be relied upon so assumptions need to be made by everyone, including SAIC. I'll have to say that I don't see anything in that summary which should have been held back from shareholders or even needed to be confidential. Is a competitor going to see that and say, "Why didn't I think of selling my product at a massive profit??" And has anyone actually requested and received the white paper which discusses those all-important assumptions, as outlined by the summary??...or is that another statement which shouldn't be relied upon. Shareholders, it might be prudent to stay laser focused on one of two points. The first is hammering Mr. Bordynuik about his claims on producing diesel for less than $10/bbl which he verbosely disseminated up through mid-2010 and then abruptly stopped pushing. The second is to hammer for information on what, why, when and how much more money it will take before even one processor is continuously producing that whatever the "fuel" is supposed to be at Mr. Bordynuik's aforementioned 2009-2010 claimed numbers. Everything else is a red herring. Don't just settle for the theme which has been going on since mid 2009 and assume that a lack of definitive information from the company must mean a processor "may" already be running.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next