Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: i-node who wrote (680508)	10/23/2012 3:49:33 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) of 1586894

There you go again. Ending MAD is not yet feasible. It may be that at some point in the future we can defend against incoming warheads, but we can't do it as of yet. Despite 30 some odd years of research. What ended the real need for MAD has been the changes in the world. But, if things change, we are still in the same box as before. With a little more breathing room, but... It works in that there has not been a nuclear weapon used in warfare for 67 years. Despite 10s of thousands of warheads out there. To say it doesn't work is as reality-free as many of your positions.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next