SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : JBII - The Secret Catalyst Turns Plastics into Oil
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Rawnoc11/17/2012 5:49:50 PM
2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 704
 
My response to snow (who has a history of sloppy mistakes and bullshit by the way):

Chris Irons told me he's more than happy to speak to any and all shareholders and callers and just kindly asked me not to post emails from him because often times they could be taken out of context in the middle of a back and forth conversation and wants to encourage shareholders to get information from him directly so there's no confusion. There's a confidentiality clause at the bottom of the email as well.

I would bet my kidneys that he didn't say a peep about refusing to talk to shareholders. Know how I know? I happen to have a "friend" (not me) who loves to test him and calls him up screaming profanities at him all the time and, even he, gets a call back every single time he leaves a message, much to my friend's surprise. My friend is an excited shareholder but he can be a....major pain in the ass. Anyway, I don't believe for one second the nonsensical theory that Chris Irons is selective on which shareholders he speaks with. I believe all he did was communicate to you exactly what he communicated to me which was to please don't post private emails, in line with JBII's confidentiality clause, or he'll restrict communications to phone calls only. He, however, has never and will never restrict phone communication with anybody. Likewise, anybody who respects the confidentiality agreement in the email won't be restricted. I think this is more than reasonable.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News