SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Petz who wrote (26342)12/2/1997 1:20:00 PM
From: Time Traveler  Read Replies (3) of 1572821
 
Petz,

"I'm now convinced the ONLY reason they can get that CPU to 300 MHz is the extremely high current they pass through the transistors."

You have convinced yourself with nonsense. The reason why the over-all DC current is higher is because of higher frequency of operation. A few months ago, we have been discussion power consumption, and where have you been? Does the equation (P is proportional to C * V^2 * f) ring any bell? Why do you and Ali insist on residing in your fantasy-like make-believe world?

"...L2 cache, which is another 1.4 amps"

How much current do the 512K L2 cache on a Socket-7 motherboard and the support chips draw? More than 1.4 amps!

"A P2-300 draws 66% more current than a K6-233, although its clock rate is only 29% higher."

K6/233 and its L2 cache together consume more power than a P-II/300. Remember K6/233 runs at higher Vcc than P-II. P oc C * V^2 * f.

No doubt is that Slot I has a superior power handling capability. It is also a multi-chip/device module which means Intel can add these filter capacitors in this thermal brick to allow the CPU running at an ever higher frequency. From a technical point of view, it is absolutely a superior solution, not to mention the MIB as well. Slot I is NOT a kludge.

John.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext