Backbench revolt forces PM to drop Israel support                                                                       
  "The cabinet will back you but the caucus won't" ...  Julia Gillard was forced to abandon her vote on a resolution to give  Palestine observer status in the UN. Photo: Andrew Meares
                                     JULIA GILLARD has been forced to withdraw Australia's support  for Israel in an upcoming United Nations vote after being opposed by  the vast majority of her cabinet and warned she would be rolled by the  caucus.
            As a result, Australia will abstain from a vote in the United  Nations General Assembly on a resolution to give Palestine observer  status in the UN, rather than join the United States and Israel in  voting against the resolution as Ms Gillard had wanted.
                                 In a direct rebuff of her leadership, Ms Gillard was opposed  by all but two of her cabinet ministers - Bill Shorten and Stephen  Conroy, both of the Victorian Right  - during a heated meeting on Monday  night.
            She was then warned by factional bosses she faced a defeat by her own backbench when the caucus met on Tuesday morning.
                The Minister for Foreign Affairs, Bob Carr, who met Ms Gillard before cabinet, drove the push to oppose the Prime Minister.
            The former Labor foreign minister Gareth Evans briefed Labor  MPs on Monday, warning they would be on the wrong side of history if  they stood with the US and Israel against the rest of the world.
            Ms Gillard had wanted to vote no while the Left faction, which is pro-Palestinian, wanted to vote for the resolution.
            The Right faction, which would usually support Ms Gillard,  backed an abstention, in part due to the views of its members that the  government was too pro-Israel, and also because many  MPs in western  Sydney, who are already fearful of losing their seats, are coming under  pressure from constituents with a Middle East background.
            Senior sources have told Fairfax Media that in cabinet on  Monday night, at least 10 ministers,  regardless of factional allegiance  and regardless of whether they were supporters of Kevin Rudd or Ms  Gillard, implored the Prime Minister  to change her view.
            At one stage there was a heated exchange between the  Environment Minister, Tony Burke, and Senator Conroy, the Communications  Minister.
            One source said Ms Gillard was told  the cabinet would  support whatever final decision she took because it was bound to support  the leader but the same could not be said of the caucus.
            ''If you want to do it, the cabinet will back you but the  caucus won't,'' a source quoted one minister as telling the Prime  Minister.
            After the meeting, Ms Gillard received separate delegations from the Left and the Right factions.
            There was to be a motion put to the caucus by the ACT  backbencher Andrew Leigh calling for Australia to back Palestine in the  UN vote.
            The Left was going to support it. Normally, the Right would  have voted against it and defeated it. But the Right conveners,  including Joel Fitzgibbon, are understood to have told Ms Gillard the  Right was not going to bind its members on the vote and she would lose  heavily. Members of the   NSW Right and others would  support the  motion.
            ''She had no choice after that,'' said one MP.
            Ms Gillard told the caucus meeting that her personal view was  to vote no because she believed the UN vote, which will pass easily  with the overwhelming support of UN member states, would hurt the peace  process because the US  has threatened to withdraw funding for the  Palestinian Authority.
            But she conceded that after sounding out ministers and MPs, Australia should abstain.
            The Israeli government is understood to be furious but an embassy spokesperson declined to comment.
            The opposition  foreign affairs spokeswoman, Julie  Bishop,  said the decision to abstain was disappointing because the Coalition  backed a no vote as ''the path to peace and reconciliation''.
  Read more: smh.com.au |