Chuck, caution is always advisable. But let's look at some of the facts:
146 stones were pulled from one little (2"?) hole. Included in that tiny sample were a 1.35 and a .95mm CLEAR, gem-quality stone. -Kimb. under only 15m of overburden. We don't know the results of the 3 angle holes; I assume those are to come.
I can assure you that if DMM had pulled these kind of results on their first sample from a SHALLOW pipe they would have done anything but abandon it!
Again, due caution.
Jimsy, re. the number of targets, ACA has themselves announced over 80 already identified. Further, why do you think this pipe is numbered 91?
:-)
Again, this pipe's results are only preliminary-- no more. But they look great, no less. Especially w/ 14C. The markets want more, understandably, and that they shall get. For now, in these markets, the SP's are holding their own. As more in the know comment on these results, we should get a better understanding as to their significance. Still need more results.
regards,
-j
:> |
