"I STILL own the ban button, buddy" Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : "I STILL own the ban button, buddy"

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Solon who wrote (865)	12/2/2012 3:45:14 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) of 2133

Of course as the writer noted: "The consent argument is the most popular and vigorously-defended way for pro-abortionists to show that abortion is ethically justified—and that the abolitionist position is unreasonable." bnonn.thinkingmatters.org.nz He wasn't addressing every reason used to justify abortion. “It ignores or denies implicit consent In nearly all cases, the woman has already given implicit consent” No. Most pregnancies are unintended and in any event, the choices one makes can be changed at the will of the autonomous human. That response begs the question of the humanity of the fetus. The science is clear. Human life begins at conception. All your name calling won't change the science. "<Note that I’m taking for granted that Harry is a human being, and that human beings have a right to life. I think both those points are uncontroversial, and in any case I’ve argued for them in the above-linked articles. Pro-abortionists will often concede this, and then use the consent argument to show that it is justifiable to kill Harry anyway—so that’s the context I’m assuming.>"

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next