Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: StockMan who wrote (26355)	12/2/1997 4:34:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway	Read Replies (1) of 1586104

Re: "I suggest you read up on why AMD and cyrix came up with the PR rating. It was because a 133Mhz 6x86/K5 == PR200 6x86." Maybe this will help you understand: amd.com AMD never produced a K5 with a greater PR than 166. If I remember correctly, the actual internal clock speed of this chip was 133 mhz; but it offered performance comparable to a vanilla 166 mhz Intel Pentium (that is, 586/P54C, NOT, as you say, 686). This is my last response to you. Individuals who haven't yet figured out that its more desirable to produce 100% 233 mhz chips than a mix of 166, 200 and 233's, and nevertheless remain as arrogant as you are not worth the time. exchange2000.com Kevin

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next