SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Land Shark who wrote (36100)12/5/2012 12:49:36 PM
From: Hawkmoon3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 86356
 
Did you even read that article? They are ESTIMATING how much the ice thickness has changed since the last glacial maximum..

Subtracting the GIA signal from GRACE data would not be a problem if we knew exactly how the ice sheets had changed in the past thousands of years and exactly how the Earth responds to such changes. However, we don’t. The greatest impediment is the uncertainty in reconstructing the post-LGM Antarctic ice sheet. Unlike the formerly-glaciated regions of the Northern Hemisphere, 98% of Antarctic bedrock remains covered by ice and the ice sheet edge is fringed by extensive ice shelves; this hampers the collection of data on ice history and introduces substantial uncertainty in reconstructions. Indeed, previous estimates of the extra volume of Antarctic ice at the LGM, compared to present-day, range from 3 to >30m of equivalent sea level (Bentley, 2010).


So that sinister looking photo comparison of "then and now" is a guesstimate based upon how much the mantle is pushed up at the edges of the ice sheet due to mass displacement from the weight of the ice sheet. But they are only have a few data points to draw from because most of the continent is covered with ice.

These results can be tested directly against global positioning system (GPS) observations of bedrock uplift. These are measurements of how the Antarctic bedrock is moving vertically. The spatial distribution of sites is limited at present – because they need to be placed directly on rocky outcrops – and there are only a few such sites in East Antarctica. In addition, some of the West Antarctic GPS records are campaign-based rather than continuous and hence are less precise than we would like – although this is being tackled through the POLENET programme.

And they are comparing 20,000 years of change in that reconstruction.. Mankind has only been in the industrial age for the last 200 years of that period.. HELLO???!!!

Anyway.. I applaud them for attempting to develop a reconstruction of 20,000 years of Ice Sheet thickness, but I think EVEN THEY would admit that far more data is needed to draw more accurate conclusions.

But I have to ask what this has to do with RECORD SEA ICE LEVELS in Antarctica this past Winter (September) in the S. Hemispher??

You just decide to pull some article out of your fourth point of contact and hope that you could overwhelm me with non-pertinent data?

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext