SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: cosmicforce who wrote (210927)12/8/2012 3:10:00 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) of 541832
 
Ah, as I thought. You're not bothered by the Nobel prize for economics but by the profession itself. I find it a bit strange that you measure the worth of the profession by the ability of its members to make money on the stock market. I know a few reasonably serious economists and I can't remember a one who had any such goals. I don't doubt there are a few. And, as I type, I recall that Paul Samuelson was reputed to have made a fortune on the stock market and I think he was on the board of TIAA-CREF for some time. But I don't recall him claiming that his economics made him a better investor/trader.

They are simply different skills/training/whatever. The only folk in the academy that I can recall doing well trading the market as opposed to investing in it were the few who spent a good bit of time tracking it, learning TA and fundamental analysis, and who practiced by the patience and the gambler mentality to do so.

As for investing rather than trading, that's a skill set even further removed. Buffett reads balance sheets constantly rather than working his way through macro or micro economic models.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext