SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : "I STILL own the ban button, buddy"

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Solon who wrote (1022)12/10/2012 1:56:55 AM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (2) of 2133
 
"Sorry, but I did not pick up anything in your excerpt or in the full quote that accused anyone of “anally raping children”--LOL!!"

Well Mr Solon-dusky, what you and Jerry call "love" is different from what non "deviant" people call love. I pointed you to the resource [Here] that clearly showed what "Loving Boys" involved and anal rape was a central feature of the practise, both THEN and NOW!

<<It didn't take more than the first section of the article that you posted to see that Solon's law forbidding slaves to "have a boy lover" was done not to protect the child but to keep all the hot young boys for himself and his friends:>>

"Plutarch did not say that"

Sure he did; if not in those exact words, the meaning is perfectly clear. Here is the pertinent part of the quote where he says:

He (Solon) also proposed a law which forbade slaves .... to have a boy lover, so that his intention was evidently to class this (having a boy lover) as an honourable and dignified practise and thus, in a sense, to recommend it to reputable men by the act of forbidding it to the unworthy.

Yes Solon and Jerry and their "reputable" friends can have these Boys and pass them around because they're so dignified and reputable. It's all so sophisticated you know.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext