SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peter Dierks who wrote (60040)12/12/2012 11:22:51 AM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
Well, to be fair Romney distanced himself from Europe and their fiscal responsibility during this crisis (austerity measures)... although at least he didn't campaign on doing the opposite (Obama). In fact at the end he promised "millions of new jobs", which was very Obama-esque to be honest.

Ron Paul was the ONLY one who really saw the situation for what it was and stated outright that things would get worse for a while but we needed to do what we needed to do. Romney was all about "doing what we needed to do" but that would make everything better immediately.

Further, you have to remember that a LOT of libertarian types are fed up with the wars and all and Romney did nothing but swagger around blasting Obama' foreign policy, which by all accounts is much more "Paul-ish" than Bush or Romney.

Probably most important was a large majority of the country was sick of Romney's lack of will to push back against the far right social agenda... this is where the "RwingNutBubble" effect comes into play... all sorts of R wingers think EVERYONE LIKES their agenda... but... THEY DONT. LOL

DAK
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext