Evening Dennis. Begin Road-test? All Hitch-Hikers welcome? This one says "Yes please! Many hands make light work!"
Seems we have a little piece of history here. by today's standards Moneta dates back longer than any other publicly traded mining company on the Toronto Stock Exchange. If you found any certs in an ancestor's attic, these certs would be worth something. I've noticed European interest is involved and wonder for how long, or if they might be even responsible for Moneta's beginning. It trades in London, and Germany as well. I've been toying with the idea of giving the foreign markets a poke to keep tabs on the price during the wee hours. No luck yet. any ideas might be good to pass on in preparation for those sleepless nights.
Moneta's success in attracting partners during the higher gold pricing speaks well for the property. And as you stated, the Barrick involvement in Michaud is "key". I would rather they choose it over Nufort, and they have, partially because of the relation to their Holt McDermot mine. Experience there could very well make Barrick best in the world at knowing what to expect and where to expect it so far as adjoining characteristic is concerned.
I understand that any backouts result in Moneta's ability to start over with somebody else, the past research becoming a value added to the property, all rights reverting back to Moneta? I'm only thinking, and would like to know if this is right from an appropriate source.
Barrick seems to be able to boast an average $200.00 production cost per ounce and with hedging has guaranteed themselves for 2 to 10 years a sale price of $400.00 or spot, which ever is greater. Their backout from Nufort could indicate a reason why they enjoy one of the best over all production discounts when compared to the rest of the major mining companies.
Should they produce, I'm wondering about what typical time frame we might learn to expect and, being these are two separate companies, any discourse that may result as the two of them will be attempting to maximize profit. More specifically, Moneta's financing and the related possibility of dilution, their ultimate profit margins as opposed to Barrick, and the rate of progress due to Barricks expressed interest in relating operations here to the Holt McDermot mine (i.e. such as the reuse of earth material.)
Are the 60% - 40% figures set in stone? I recall mention of a possible 70% - 30% somewhere but this could be unrelated.
Any links to what I'm covering are still in the computer and will be listed soon for all to see "where and why" I've been poking around. Some may be informative or others just amusing. In saving people some time, and provoking ideas, all I am trying to promote is the richly rewarding quality of laziness and a general hope of closing the gap between what we know and what really is, as much as possible.
dave |