Imperial Metals (IPM.T) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Imperial Metals (IPM.T)

IPM 1.960

+1.6%

Nov 5 3:45 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: refugee investor who wrote (1214)	12/28/2012 9:56:00 AM
From: Italian Investor	Read Replies (1) of 1366

I think you are right on the JBGS and JGBD ETNs looking @ the reported expense ratios looking almost the same but I know UNG reports an expense ratio of less than 1% also but you pay way more than this because performace is not what you would expext looking @ NG prices to UNG. I could of swore I read somewhere they were way more expensive due to maintaing the leverage and constantly buying and selling kind of like UNG does not really track NG prices correctly. I am going to follow it more closley going foward. Both MRVL and MBI I got lucky many times, last time I exited @ 8 on both names and they are both lower now. I have a pretty big gain on both, but MBI is probably 100%+ since I got into this name due to trading. My only holdings @ the moment are Fairfax, RFP, YCS, JGBS and JGBD.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next