SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : QUANTUM
QNTM 9.750-2.0%3:18 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: William T. Katz who wrote (5984)12/3/1997 10:16:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen   of 9124
 
You're right Bill, I am going by current costs re digital photography. 15 sheets of photo quality paper costs $10 for the Kodak Digital Science camera. That's just for the paper, and paper isn't electronics, so I'm not sure how much the price will come down. Then there is the ink cartridges, and from people I know who print color, the ink goes fast, and they're $32 a pop, or there about.

That said, I do believe there are many uses for these cameras, such as for real estate agents, for example. They can drive out to a house, take a picture, go back to the office, download the picture, and pop it into a flyer in MS Word or some such. Also my nephew has found a use for it; he takes pictures of family events here and e-mails the pictures to his uncle who is overseas. But for instance, if I go on a vacation, I can't imagine it would be very handy to use a digital camera unless I also had a laptop with me, as a download receptacle. On the highest resolution, these digital cameras can only store like six pictures at a time, then they are full, and you have to download the images. I'm keeping an eye on the $ and practicality issues, and when the mix becomes attractive, I am certainly not against buying one.

DK
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext