2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 395.80

+0.1%

Dec 15 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (97652)	1/10/2013 7:40:13 PM
From: arun gera	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 218509

>Yes, that's correct [near enough for government work]. I'd rather France have nukes than Libya, Israel than Iraq or Iran or Egypt or Syria, UK rather than any of the third world or Argentina [or do you think of Argentia as part of "the West"], USA than China, Russia or Pakistan. South Korea than North Korea [assuming South Korea is part of "the West"].> All you are saying is that you prefer the allies of the Western powers to have nuclear weapons. It is is your tribal instinct speaking. Don't worry about North Korea as it seems like it is going to join the western alliance soon, it seems. Gangnam style. Burma is also being brought into the western alliance. South Africa was sanctioned for apartheid on the surface but likely because the Botha government was developing nuclear weapons. <Perhaps you don't know about Mr Proliferator Khan of Pakistan who was doing a good line in export nukes> Israel was doing Khan's work - trying to trade nuclear weapons technology with Iran and South Africa. guardian.co.uk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next