Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (692348)	1/11/2013 2:23:42 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) of 1575521

TWY, let me put it this way. If it takes just one person armed with maybe a six-shooter to stop a crazed gunman, then why would law-abiding citizens need high-capacity magazines to defend themselves? And if it takes just a few seconds to change a magazine, then why would law-abiding citizens need them? The only self-defense justification that I can think of for these magazines is defending one's home from multiple armed intruders. But then you've just turned your home into a fortress. And for what, to defend yourself against an army? By the way, noticed that I said that high-capacity magazines should be "strictly regulated." Not outright banned. If you can't tell the difference, that's not my fault. Tenchusatsu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next