2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 375.93

-1.8%

4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TobagoJack who wrote (97781)	1/13/2013 6:41:23 PM
From: GPS Info	Read Replies (1) of 217755

So, I do read and then reread your posts to ensure that I understand; however, I may not in this case. Are you saying the pollution in Beijing is necessary because of the amount of infrastructure that has been developed and currently under construction in and around Beijing? China will desalinate the ocean, build more solar panels and provide irrigation systems near its deserts? I'm left to infer that the censorship concerning the level of air pollution is a necessary constraint because it would be inconvenient for the larger population to know the potential (or true) health costs of this industrial development. As a corollary I would suppose that China's ambitions must not (unduly) consider the environmental or the human costs associated with these developments. There may be one or two posters on this board who will agree with this. I might presume that these other projects could also benefit a bit of CCP censorship. Your other point might be that some first world countries are now control by the 1% and can't invest in infrastructure anymore. If so, that is an interesting hypothesis.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next