you are not serious, thumping chest without a thought underpinning the thumping, believing a wager of 1k over the net is serious rather than stupid. you are not stupid i am supposing.
this is serious Message 28631442
"... the tally below kicks off the stance into 2013
Traded
-0.25% cash
12.40% paper metals (au:pgm:ag @ 92:5:3)
5.97% equities (gdx, gdxj, fnv, slw, nem, abx, paas, tplm, mcd, nus, remx, ares, and cpf in usa, alligator energy in australia, hkex in hong kong, and vermilion energy and petrobank energy in canada)
Non-traded
17.05% private equity (incl gold mine / gold loan, teeth, crude additive, whatever, all marked at cost or lower)
19.76% physical metals (au:pgm @ 73:27)
45.07% real estate rentals and plays (all essentially marked to transaction market)
amongst all of the above, there are only 5 conviction trades, namely gold, platinum, silver, the mines, and hk real estate. ..."
i am wagered in gold, that which rises should china continue to traverse incline under the leadership of the cccp. am admittedly hedge by the same gold wager, that which rises should the cccp wobble, else rises should usd domain wobble.
i am staked in hk real estate, same as above wager, working basically the same way, but better if cccp stands or transforms, rather than fall, am guessing.
but the platinum wager is all cccp-bull bet, given china off-take of global platinum production and the uses pt is put to.
you may put on a similar sized cccp-bear wager.
as the pie is unlikely to get larger on per global capita basis, we are already squared off per our world views, and the adjudication is left to truly objective adjudicator, the market, as in my gain would be your loss, and i fully intend to seriously gain.
how are you staked per your world view? do tell, and so we can see how you would lose to me.
now, get serious, short china telecom, petro china, baidu, and bank of china. showing c2 the trade tickets and monthly statement would do as evidence. i shall put on an equal long wager and do same for evidence.
do not be a wus. |
