Yes, the official government conspiracy theory demands we suspend our disbelief as the twin towers, black smoke streaming out signalling oxygen-starved fires, suddenly, after barely an hour, explode with a violent volcanic-like pyroclastic flow, shooting huge metal beams out laterally hundreds of yards at 60-mph, while the towers collapse symmetrically straight through their path of greatest resistance -- at free-fall speed.
Later that day, WTC building 7 would also suddenly explode and collapse symmetrically (after several witnesses hear a countdown) and like the other towers, this 49-story building also collapses through its path of most resistance at free-fall speed, into its own footprint -- due, they claim, because of scattered office fires.
It looked exactly like a controlled demolition -- supported by testimony from over 300 first responders, police and firemen -- all reported hearing secondary explosions and seeing bright flashes ringing the structures. But did the government's official 9-11 report find any evidence at all of pre planted explosives?
Why no -- they didn't bother to test for that. Why should they just because it looked like a controlled demolition to all the newscasters and witnesses that day -- and to all the other people who saw these three steel-frame buildings make history as the very first and only steel-frame buildings on earth to ever collapse due to fire -- as proposed by NIST using junk computer simulations.
But we're the conspiracy nuts?
Let's just go invade Iraq, which had absolutely nothing to do with the attack, and take away their non-existent weapons of mass destruction. Yeah, that's what we should do -- even though the alleged hijackers were all Saudis. It'll only cost us a couple of trillion dollars -- but what they heck. |
