SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alighieri who wrote (696593)2/1/2013 1:10:11 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) of 1575171
 
The fact is the government is the biggest threat to human rights and always has been.

>>Whatever...you're entitled to your private fears, even as I am entitled to consider them unfounded....we're talking modern day USA now, ok...

There is no private “unfounded” fear in this regard. Sometimes fears are founded in fact. In this case the protections outlined in the bill of rights were designed to protect American citizens from potential abuse by the American Government. That single notion is exactly what the Bill of Rights was founded on (fear of government encroachment on human rights). I would love to see any argument to that point if you have one.


...and that the government has finally managed to circumvent and nullify that intent.

>>How?
Al
I think I have already addressed that. Simply stated in one word, “infringement,” specifically with regard to the 2nd amendment.

It is clear from historical records, the intent of the 2nd amendment was to keep the government from ever considering itself superior, in power, to the people of America.

Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power, and jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive.
(Noah Webster)

It is clear that the founders saw an armed population essential to the protection of liberty and an unarmed population as threatened. Not just armed but as well or better armed than government forces. That is not the case today and the government has taken the reigns from American citizens in this regard. The 2nd amendment was designed to keep that from happening, but it has.

"What country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms." (Thomas Jefferson)

"The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." (Alexander Hamilton)

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext